This week, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in Alvarez v. Smith. The SCOTUS Blog had the following blurb today:
JURIST covers yesterday’s decision in Alvarez v. Smith, holding that individuals whose personal property was seized during a drug investigation could not challenge the seizure because the parties had already resolved underlying disputes concerning ownership; also reporting on Alvarez, the Volokh Conspiracy observes that in its ruling, the Court avoided the “potentially important” constitutional question, while the Christian Science Monitor recaps the case’s background.
0 comments:
Post a Comment