Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Supreme Court Grants Cert In Three Cases

The Supreme Court's order list for November 2, 2009 is below. 

The SCOTUS Blog had the following regarding the orders:

The Court has granted certiorari in Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Lanning (08-998), New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board (08-1457), and Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. Commerce Energy, Inc. (09-223). As of this grant, Akin Gump represents the respondent in Hamilton v. Lanning.

The Court  invited briefs from the Solicitor General in four more cases, listed below the jump.
The full order list is here.
Docket: 08-998

Title: Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Lanning

Issue: The Court limited the question presented to the following: “Whether in calculating the debtor’s ‘projected disposal income’ during the plan period, the bankruptcy court may consider evidence suggesting that the debtor’s income or expenses during that period are likely to be different from her income or expenses during the pre-filing period.”
Note: Akin Gump now represents the respondent in this case.

Docket: 08-1457

Title: New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board

Issue: Whether Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 153(b), authorizes the NLRB to act when only two of its five positions are filled, if the Board has previously delegated its full powers to a three-member group of the Board that includes the two remaining members; does the NLRB have authority to decide cases with only two sitting members, where 29 U.S.C. § 153(b) provides that “three members of the Board shall, at all times, constitute a quorum of the Board”?
Docket: 09-223

Title: Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. Commerce Energy, Inc.

Issue: Does either the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341, or comity principles bar federal court jurisdiction over a case alleging federal equal protection and dormant commerce clause claims when the plaintiffs do not challenge their own tax assessment and the relief sought is directed to specific tax exemptions or exclusions applicable to only four other taxpayers?
The Court has invited the Solicitor General to submit briefs in the following cases:

Docket: 09-34

Title: Pfizer Inc. v. Abdullahi et al.

Issue: Whether Alien Tort Statute (ATS) jurisdiction can extend to a private actor based on alleged state action by a foreign government where there is no allegation that the government knew of or participated in the specific acts by the private actor claimed to have violated international law. Whether, absent state action, a complaint that a private actor has conducted a clinical trial of a medication without adequately informed consent can surmount the “high bar to new private causes of action” under the ATS.
Note: Neither Chief Justice Roberts nor Justice Sotomayor took part in this order.

Docket: 08-1438; 09-109

Title: Sossamon v. Texas; Cardinal v. Metrish

Issue: Whether states and state officials may be subject to suit for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§2000cc to 2000cc-5?
For 08-1438:
For 09-109:
Note: Howe & Russell represents the petitioners in both cases.

Docket: 09-115

Title: U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. Candelaria

Issues: Whether an Arizona statute that imposes sanctions on employers who hire unauthorized aliens is invalid under a federal statute that expressly “preempt[s] any State or local law imposing civil or criminal sanctions (other than through licensing and similar laws) upon those who employ, or recruit or refer for a fee for employment, unauthorized aliens”; whether the Arizona statute, which requires all employers to participate in a federal electronic employment verification system, is preempted by a federal law that specifically makes that system voluntary; whether the Arizona statute is impliedly preempted because it undermines the “comprehensive scheme” that Congress created to regulate the employment of aliens.

0 comments:

Post a Comment